CEO Bonnie Copeland end Baltimore schools a matter of concern

CEO Bonnie Copeland end Baltimore schools a matter of conce CEO Bonnie Copeland Baltimore schools from 1 July 2006. They had with them for three years, which is a norm for an urban school superintendent. Its purpose was not of their choice. The Baltimore school board had considered a low-key management and was not strong enough leaders to make the changes necessary to reform school, Baltimore. Your reasoning seems to have been a little 'buggy. During his tenure with the Baltimore schools, Copeland maintains a financial management and trend that has been recognized by leading rating agencies and schools at national level, and positions eliminated in 1100? even if its predecessor, Carmen Russo, the school in a mess. The test results have been increasing, and received a good quality for their significant progress in the Baltimore schools in GBC, a high patronage of the regional group. This came in 2003, after the group? Financial review of the Baltimore schools. Copeland has not been without its enemies, but. The Greater Baltimore Committee, anchored in the bureaucracy and complacency was not a follower of Copeland, and still the rule Baltimore schools. Moreover, politicians who wanted to damage Mayor Martin O? Malley, saw the troubled Baltimore schools as a means perfect. A political battle between the mayor, Montgomery County Executive Doug Duncan, and later with Ehrlick Goveor Robert Copeland mistakenly caught in the middle. The Baltimore school board was with Copeland and her staff? S daily activities, her work not performed. This type of interference will hamper the next managing director and, unless the school board of Baltimore to its senses. Copeland is in terrible circumstances, would have crippled lesser CEO, but has much to improve the Baltimore schools. E 'was the fifth CEO since 1997. The Baltimore schools track record with their CEOs is not good. The community is frustrated by Copeland? S exit. You have much to connect business people and companies with schools in Baltimore, and fear that these compounds will be canceled. Parents are responsible for their children? Future educational opportunities. Loss of a major reform for the Baltimore schools makes it difficult for the community to be optimistic for the future. Half of the schools and special education program is still in trouble, too many children are unprepared, or drop in school or at work, and is safe for the slow progress, now that Copeland. It seems that the reform is still difficult, to the Board and the CEO of a good opponent the opportunity to make her work. This information about the schools of Baltimore is brought to you by